Critically Evaluate Usefulness Of Theories Of Groups Nursing Essay

Fincham (1999) states that “In the assignment abode abundant of our amusing behaviour occurs in a accumulation text”, about I acquire that abundant of our lives are spent in groups (Lawler (2005)), suggesting that the added individuals collaborate in these altered groups, the added they behave in a assertive way.

Researchers like Robbins (2010) acquire activate that there is a aberration amid a accumulation and a team; “a accumulation is two or added individuals, interacting and absolute who acquire appear calm to accomplish accurate objectives, to advice anniversary accumulation affiliate accomplish aural his or her breadth of responsibility”, admitting a aggregation is “a set of bodies structured, whose alone efforts aftereffect in achievement that is greater than the sum of the alone inputs,” Robbins et al (2010). Mullins (2005) about identifies that Belbin (2000) suggests that there are absolutely a cardinal of aspects that differentiate groups from teams for archetype the admeasurement (a accumulation may acquire any cardinal of affiliate admitting aggregation associates is from four to six individuals). Accepting articular the attenuate differences amid groups and teams, we can see that individuals behave one way in a aggregation and addition in a group.

Groups and teams vary, the aberration actuality the way in which they are structured alignment from a academic accumulation to an breezy accumulation (McKenna (1994)) and a botheration analytic aggregation to a self-managed aggregation (Robbins et al 2010). Through the assay of my adventures of alive in both environments, I can analyze the altered types that could be acclimated to call the groups and teams in which I performed.

An basal archetype of a academic accumulation I partook in, is the prefect anatomy (21 individuals with an aim to advance the school) to which I was called at Fearnhill School. Anniversary alone was set to advance their own achievement to accomplish their capital objective, which was to be called to be arch girl/boy. I acquire activate that the accumulation ambience aloft differs from The Young Enterprise self-managed aggregation I additionally alternate in, as the aggregation associates formed calm to accomplish the set ambition (to accomplish profit) breadth alone inputs advance to abundant aggregation achievement (Mullins (2007)).

Analysing and attractive at the Advice I aggregate on the altered types of teams, The Young Enterprise aggregation I was in was a baby team. This aggregation could additionally be apparent as a acting aggregation as it was alone formed to accomplish a specific assignment and again we bankrupt up to do our own things. The aggregation was absolute as it did not await on any alternative teams for abutment or skills, as colleagues we aloof relied on anniversary other. About alike admitting we were alone a accumulation of acceptance at school, the aggregation was a academic aggregation as it was to accomplish a specific assignment (to accomplish a profit) clearly and we were recognised as Eclipse to the alternative competitors in the market.

Why assignment in groups and teams? The acknowledgment to this catechism varies from actuality to person, (Jim McNally (1994)), but the best accepted account is that groups acquire adapted advice compared to the one alone (Robbins et al (2010)).This identifies that back individuals assignment together, they are added acceptable to acquire added artistic account than the one alone because they acquire assorted abilities and account amid them. About Mullins (2005) recognises there are alternative affidavit why bodies assignment in groups and teams such as the actuality that bodies consistently appetite to belong, suggesting that acceptance to a group/teams gives them a faculty of character and value. Addition acumen for establishing teams or groups is that individuals in these categories additionally acquire accepted compassionate of anniversary other; they abutment and assure anniversary alternative back adverse ambiguous bearings (McKenna (1994)).

This ascertainment shows that individuals in groups and teams do not alone accretion from accomplishing the set goals but additionally alone and socially (Mullins (2005)). For archetype in the prefect anatomy I was complex in at Fearnhill, anniversary prefect was accustomed a assignment to backpack out but for some acumen or another, one of us would be clumsy to backpack out the set tasks. If and back this occurred all the accumulation associates came calm to abutment and we would all angle in to accomplish abiding that the assignment was complete until the accumulation affiliate was accessible to backpack out their own tasks. I activate this was one of the allowances of actuality in the accumulation as if the alone was on their own, no amount what, they would acquire had to accomplish abiding that they completed the assignment by themselves. Reflecting on Mullins’ (2005; 2007) affidavit for the accumulation of groups/teams, they account the individuals as able-bodied as the achievement of the teams by accomplishing the set goals.

Numerous advisers like McKenna (1994) and Mullins (2005) accepting articular the allowances of the abstraction of groups and teams, still charge to be developed if they are activity to be effective; Amount 1 “Theories of accumulation development” apparent below, identifies that groups go through bristles stages of development which are accepted as; forming, storming, norming, assuming and adjourning.

Figure 1 “Theories of accumulation development”, (Buchanan et al (1997)) ; Based on Tuckman (1965); Tuckman and Jensen (1977); and Jones (1973).

Forming

•

Confusion

•

Uncertainty

•

Assessing situation

•

Testing arena rules

Storming

•

Disagreements over priorities

•

Struggle for leadership

•

Tension

•

Hostility

•

Clique formation

Norming

•

Consensus

•

Leadership accepted

•

Trust established

•

Standards set

•

New abiding roles

•

Co

operation

Performing

•

Successful performance

•

Flexible assignment roles

•

Openness

•

Helpfulness

•

Delusion, abort and acceptance

Adjourning

•

Disengagement

•

Anxiety about break and ending

•

Positive activity appear the leader

•

Sadness

•

Self

evaluation

•

Feeling out others

•

Defining goals

•

Getting acquainted

•

Establishing rules

Stage 1

Immature

group

Stage 2

Fractionated

group

Stage 3

Sharing group

Stage 4

Effective team

Stage 5

Disbanding

group

TASK FUNCTIONS

PERSONAL RELATIONS BETWEEN GROUP MEMBERS

Interdependence

Cohesion

Conflict

Dependency

In 2009 I absitively to accompany The Young Enterprise aggregation which was based on a accumulation of 3 people. The accumulation associates complex actuality Carissa Morgan, Jasmine Rani and I Virginia Simenda. During 2009 (year 12) we entered The Young Enterprise competition, we had to appear up with account on how to accomplish money and accompany those account to life. The aim of the activity was to get into a aggregation with colleagues and accordingly authorize a baby business, and apprentice to assignment calm to accomplish the activity a success by authoritative profit.

To get started we aboriginal had to anatomy the group, in the case that we were already an breezy accumulation this was not a difficult assignment to execute. About in a bearings breadth the individuals do not apperceive anniversary other, it would be added difficult and time arresting to anatomy the aggregation as the individuals would charge time to acquire and accept anniversary alternative (forming) (Buchanan et al (1997)). We again had to delegate, job roles to anniversary affiliate so they became amenable in their defined area, which embraces Belbin’s Teams Access (Handy (1993).

The positions were delegated as below;

Carissa Morgan – Marketing and Advertising

Jasmine Rani – IT Director and Sales Rep

Virginia Simenda – Accounts Director and Product Shopper

This activity activated our adeptness to be amenable in our specific areas, the accent of teamwork and communication. Beneath is Amount 2′..a arrangement of behaviour that characterises one person’s behaviour in affiliation to addition in facilitating the advance of the team’ (Belbin, 1981; 2000).

Assessing the team, there is affidavit that anniversary aggregation affiliate was admired as they provided the aggregation with characteristics which advance to the success of the team, acknowledging Belbin’s abstraction that anniversary aggregation affiliate has a role to comedy for the aggregation to accomplish (Buchanan et al (1997)).

Carissa’s administration abilities contributed to the aggregation and organised the team, she did her best to abstract the best out of the team, which the aggregation appreciated. Her interpersonal advice abilities accepted to be admired as it meant she had aplomb to articulation her opinions. Carissa would acquire been articular as the co-ordinator, adviser analyzer and specialist of the team.

Jasmine’s capital accomplishment articular as actuality admired was her researching skills; she acclimated it calmly and finer to the team’s advantage. She was acceptable at carrying her account to the blow of the aggregation which showed acceptable advice and interpersonal skills. The analysis Jasmine agitated out showed that she was committed and adumbrated she was bent for the aggregation to succeed. Jasmine would acquire been articular as the implementer, bulb and ability investigator of the team

The capital abilities that set me abreast from the blow of the aggregation associates were my accounts skills. It enabled me to aftermath the accordant abstracts bedding to accredit the aggregation associates to appraise the team’s achievement financially. I was additionally able to back my account to the blow of the team, which showed my advice and interpersonal skills. I would acquire been articular as the sharpener, teamworker and complete finisher of the team. Overall it can be apparent that anniversary aggregation affiliate had their own roles which can be articular on Belbin’s model. This ambience has accurate to be acknowledged as the aggregation acquired bazaar share.

However reviewing Tuckman’s access (figure 1), the affronted stage, I accept that disagreements do not aloof appear about; they may be the aftereffect of abridgement of advice skills. As associates of the aggregation had adulatory advice skills, it has led me to acquire that that is the acumen the affronted date may not be axiomatic in the team’s development. The adjourning date of the aggregation was not alarming as the individuals were in an breezy accumulation aboriginal and would abide to be so afterwards this date was complete. Although actuality a acceptable base model, it can be absolutely ambagious the exact date a aggregation will be at may not be identifiable (the stages may overlap), as able-bodied as the actuality that it does not adviser the user on the times at which they should apprehend anniversary date to be complete as individuals assignment as altered paces.

Fincham (1999) states that “this typology reflects the admeasurement to which accumulation members’ behaviour is bent by the accumulation action and structure.” “The appulse on members’ behaviour, values, and attributes of interacting and antidotal groups is far greater than in co-acting groups because of the added acuteness of alternation they involve”. This suggests that assertive behaviours may aftereffect because of the way the aggregation is structured. The Young Enterprise aggregation was a self-managed aggregation (Robbins et al (2010)), which meant we depended on anniversary alternative in adjustment to be a advantageous team.

This aggregation had no official baton but instead had a administrator to whom we appear progress. Since our aggregation was almost small, it was not decumbent to amusing dabbling (Robbins et al (2010)). Anniversary aggregation affiliate had to comedy their allotment so the aggregation would be successful. Account of how to accumulation maximise were brought about by brainstorming. I acquire activate that it bargain acquiescence aural the aggregation as anniversary aggregation affiliate acquainted encouraged to accompany advanced their account and opinions after activity the fears of actuality banned (Mullins (2007)). Although brainstorming was an able access as it enabled anniversary aggregation affiliate to be creative, appropriately “generating added and bigger account than the aforementioned cardinal of individuals alive on their own” (Mullin (2005)), as a accumulation we apparent that brainstorming could be absolutely time arresting as we all had to accommodated up in adjustment to activate the account and alike again decisions may not aftereffect (Mullin (2007)).

I am absorbed to acquire that groupthink is a behaviour that is mainly articular in teams breadth there are added individuals as able-bodied as the actuality that it depends on the aggregation members’ characters (McKenna (1994)). The individuals I was alive with were actual adamant and capital to achieve, so actuality abeyant was not an option. Anniversary aggregation affiliate was continuously adopting means in which they acquainted the aggregation could develop, every anniversary in the aggregation meetings. I acquire groupthink does exist, but it mainly rests aloft the characteristics of the individuals.

“The chancy About-face abnormality is the addiction of a accumulation to accomplish decisions of a accumulation to accomplish decisions that are riskier than those that the associates of the accumulation would acquire recommended individually”, (Buchanan (1994)). Although during the times at which the Young Enterprise aggregation was active, the actuality of this chancy about-face access had not been identified, I can recognise that it existed aural the team. As a accumulation we gambled back we purchased appurtenances back we did not acquire affirmation of customer interest, as an alone I would acquire never taken such a huge accident as it may acquire resulted as a accident if the articles had not appealed to the consumers’ tastes.

Having articular some of the behavioural theories of groups and teams, the capital point I acquire articular is that altered theories are able and able in altered situations. The capability of Tuckman’s access (figure 1) for example, I acquire would be added axiomatic actuality activated to a aggregation bigger than The Young Enterprise aggregation as able-bodied as bodies who were not in an breezy accumulation to activate with for the abounding action to booty its course. The capital disadvantage of this action about is that it can be absolutely time arresting and would be clashing to administer on teams that are consistently alteration as they will not acquire time to administer all the stages as it is appropriate that too little time may aftereffect in issues not actuality dealt with abundantly at a accurate date (Buchanan (1997)). I accordingly acquire that the theories of accumulation behaviour may be acclimated to maximise the capability of a team’s success depending on how able-bodied they are activated to the accustomed circumstance.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Order a Unique Copy of this Paper